Abstract

ESR Endangered Species Research Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials ESR 32:43-57 (2017) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00786 Theme Section: 21st century paradigms for measuring and managing the effects of anthropogenic ocean noise Potential for spatial displacement of Cook Inlet beluga whales by anthropogenic noise in critical habitat Robert J. Small1,*, Brian Brost2, Mevin Hooten3,2,4, Manuel Castellote5,6, Jeffrey Mondragon1 1Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1255 West 8th Street, Juneau, AK 99801, USA 2Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, 1484 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 3U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 1484 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 4Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, 1484 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 5Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO), University of Washington, 3737 Brooklyn Avenue NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA 6Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Marine Mammal Laboratory, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, USA *Corresponding author: bob.small@alaska.gov ABSTRACT: The population of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, Alaska, USA, declined by nearly half in the mid-1990s, primarily from an unsustainable harvest, and was listed as endangered in 2008. In 2014, abundance was ~340 whales, and the population trend during 1999-2014 was -1.3% yr-1. Cook Inlet beluga whales are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts, and noise that has the potential to reduce communication and echolocation range considerably has been documented in critical habitat; thus, noise was ranked as a high potential threat in the Cook Inlet beluga Recovery Plan. The current recovery strategy includes research on effects of threats potentially limiting recovery, and thus we examined the potential impact of anthropogenic noise in critical habitat, specifically, spatial displacement. Using a subset of data on anthropogenic noise and beluga detections from a 5 yr acoustic study, we evaluated the influence of noise events on beluga occupancy probability. We used occupancy models, which account for factors that affect detection probability when estimating occupancy, the first application of these models to examine the potential impacts of anthropogenic noise on marine mammal behavior. Results were inconclusive, primarily because beluga detections were relatively infrequent. Even though noise metrics (sound pressure level and noise duration) appeared in high-ranking models as covariates for occupancy probability, the data were insufficient to indicate better predictive ability beyond those models that only included environmental covariates. Future studies that implement protocols designed specifically for beluga occupancy will be most effective for accurately estimating the effect of noise on beluga displacement. KEY WORDS: Beluga whales · Anthropogenic noise · Spatial displacement · Occupancy models Full text in pdf format Supplementary material PreviousNextCite this article as: Small RJ, Brost B, Hooten M, Castellote M, Mondragon J (2017) Potential for spatial displacement of Cook Inlet beluga whales by anthropogenic noise in critical habitat. Endang Species Res 32:43-57. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00786 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in ESR Vol. 32. Online publication date: February 07, 2017 Print ISSN: 1863-5407; Online ISSN: 1613-4796 Copyright © 2017 Inter-Research.

Highlights

  • Beluga whales Delphinapterus leucas in Cook Inlet, Alaska, USA, are a genetically distinct and geographically isolated population that remains year-round in the inlet (O’Corry-Crowe et al 1997, Laidre et al 2000, Rugh et al 2000)

  • Beluga whales were detected at all mooring sites, but the proportion of 1 h sampling occasions for which belugas were detected by either ecological acoustic recorder (EAR) or C-PODs was < 5% for most sites (Table 1)

  • Models including both site and device were important. The need for both effects in this component of the model suggests that thinning of beluga whale detections varies substantially across sites and device types. This is the first study where the potential for spatial displacement of marine mammals by anthropogenic noise was analyzed through occupancy modeling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Beluga whales Delphinapterus leucas in Cook Inlet, Alaska, USA, are a genetically distinct and geographically isolated population that remains year-round in the inlet (O’Corry-Crowe et al 1997, Laidre et al 2000, Rugh et al 2000). Cook Inlet beluga whales are vulnerathe mid-inlet and coastal areas extending to the ble to anthropogenic impacts due to their small popusouthern limit of the inlet (Fig. 1) The most tainty about which threats may be impeding recovery, recent abundance estimate, in 2014, was 340 whales the Recovery Plan (NMFS 2016) identified 10 potential (CV 0.08), and the population trend over the 15 yr pe- threats and their respective relative concern as either riod between 1999 and 2014 was −1.3% annually The may become extinct unless factors that are impeding recovery strategy includes conducting research on recovery are determined and mitigated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call