Abstract

Through symbiotic biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), grain legumes, such as groundnuts, can enhance soil nitrogen (N) and be an important source of N fertility, as well as a critical component of human nutrition and food security. Because legumes obtain N from soil N stocks as well as BNF, legume residues are key to capturing potential N benefits for soils, which may contribute to increased yields and food production. Here, we conducted a detailed survey at household and field level within a six-village corridor along the western boundary of Kibale National Park (KNP) in western Uganda. We focused on groundnut production and residue management practices and soil organic carbon (SOC) and total N (TN) in fields managed by 100 different households. We also determined SOC and TN in adjacent uncultivated KNP soils. We tested for relationships between socioeconomic factors and farmer groundnut management practices. We calculated a partial N balance and estimated potential N benefits under three scenarios for groundnut BNF. Within the study area, groundnut residue management varied greatly with 51% of surveyed farmers retaining residues on fields through spreading or incorporation, and 49% removing residues, either by transfer to banana groves or burning. Groundnut population density was relatively high with 43% of fields having >30 plants m−2. Despite providing net N inputs of up to 27 kg N ha−1, there was no observed effect of groundnut residue management practices on SOC, TN, or soil C:N ratios. Compared to uncultivated KNP soils, groundnut fields had lower mean levels of SOC and TN and wider C:N ratios. These values are consistent with cultivated soils; however, losses of SOC and TN were lower compared to losses previously reported for conversion from tropical forest to agricultural use. We found that farmer valuation and perception of groundnut residues were influential factors in residue management practices. Overall, we estimated that groundnut residues have the potential to contribute to SOC and TN stocks if retained in the field, but, conversely, removal will result in sizable losses. We find that both environmental and social contexts must be considered when recommending legumes for N provisioning services.

Highlights

  • Nutrient depletion is a primary factor in soil degradation and low and declining crop yields across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Stoorvogel and Smaling, 1990; Tully et al, 2015a)

  • Our objectives were: (1) to assess differences in groundnut residue management; (2) to estimate the potential N benefit from groundnut residues based on their management; (3) to determine if groundnut residue management impacts soil organic carbon (SOC) and total N (TN); and (4) to explore soil and socioeconomic factors driving groundnut residue management practices

  • We identify important knowledge gaps with respect to groundnut management, residue management and SOM or N benefits from legumes in SSA, as well as the importance of including information about residue management and variety selection to maximize biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) efficiency when legumes are recommended as a component of ecological nutrient management

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nutrient depletion is a primary factor in soil degradation and low and declining crop yields across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Stoorvogel and Smaling, 1990; Tully et al, 2015a). Among countries in SSA, Uganda experiences some of the highest rates of land degradation, resulting in lower agricultural productivity (Stoorvogel and Smaling, 1990; Wortmann and Kaizzi, 1998; Nkonya et al, 2005). In Uganda, inorganic fertilizer accessibility, availability, and affordability is limited for smallholder farmers (Omamo, 2003). Organic inputs are often the main option for smallholder farmers and are a potentially more environmentally sustainable nutrient source. Only 15% of Ugandan households reported adding organic or inorganic fertilizers or pesticides to common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and only 14% added these inputs to maize (Zea mays L.) (UBOS, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.