Abstract

BackgroundLaparoscopic colorectal surgeries offer numerous advantages over their open counterparts. To compare these measurable short-time outcomes of open and laparoscopic resections in Hungary, data of colorectal surgeries were collected and analysed. The study focused on identifying patients’ characteristics that can influence the decision on laparoscopic colorectal resections and on comparing efficiency of Hungarian colorectal operations with international data.MethodsUsing patients’ data of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery performed in 2015 and 2016 from the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary, a countrywide retrospective comparative analysis was done. Logistic regression was used to explore main influencing factors for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.ResultsA total of 17,876 colorectal surgical cases, including 14,876 open and 3,000 laparoscopic resections were selected and analysed. Laparoscopy was used only in 16.78% of all cases. Comparison of age groups showed that odds ratio (OR) of laparoscopic colorectal resections was significantly lower in over 40 years than in younger patients (18–39 years). In university institutes patients had higher odds (OR: 2.23 p<0.0001) for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Presence of comorbidity codes and preoperative treatment in internal medicine department decreased odds for laparoscopic colorectal operations.ConclusionsPatients’ age, comorbidities and hospital type influenced the likelihood of decision on laparoscopic colorectal resection. Selection of patients contributed to improved laparoscopic outcomes.

Highlights

  • Laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) techniques offer numerous advantages over their open counterparts, including shorter hospitalization, faster recovery and reduced morbidity

  • Patients’ age, comorbidities and hospital type influenced the likelihood of decision on laparoscopic colorectal resection

  • Potential considerations in decision making on laparoscopic colorectal resections Age categories, sex, main diagnoses, majority of secondary diagnoses, and university or national centres were significantly associated with choosing LCR technique over open colorectal resections (OCR) (Table 5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) techniques offer numerous advantages over their open counterparts, including shorter hospitalization, faster recovery and reduced morbidity. LCR were not clearly documented in the Hungarian healthcare database before 2014; surgeons could use only the intervention codes of open colorectal resections (OCR) at administration, and hospitals received the same funding both for laparoscopic and open surgeries [17]. The aim of our study is to identify independent predictors that influence the decision to use laparoscopic techniques for colorectal resections in Hungary. Laparoscopic colorectal surgeries offer numerous advantages over their open counterparts To compare these measurable short-time outcomes of open and laparoscopic resections in Hungary, data of colorectal surgeries were collected and analysed. The study focused on identifying patients’ characteristics that can influence the decision on laparoscopic colorectal resections and on comparing efficiency of Hungarian colorectal operations with international data

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call