Abstract

This study examines the perspectives of Swedish undergraduate students regarding potential conflicts between ownership rights and environmental protection. Conceptions of ‘ownership’ are relevant in relation to the environment and environmental protection as they can highlight a more transboundary relationship between the individual/society and nature. Students studying economics, law and political science were chosen because of their potential future transformative roles as decision makers and policy makers. Content analysis was employed to examine the written responses of 747 students from seven different universities to the open-ended survey question: Can ownership rights and environmental protection come into conflict? Students’ responses were measured twice: at the very beginning of the first semester and then again at the end of the semester. The results show that students expressed a dominant view of ownership in terms of individual ownership, and associations to collective ownership were largely absent. In regards to the potential conflict between ownership rights and environmental protection, most students perceived such a conflict, and it was more common for the environment to be conceptualised as the losing party rather than the landowner. More research is needed regarding how teaching and instruction can deal with the potential conflicts between ownership (private/corporate/governmental) and environmental protection.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to explore Swedish social science undergraduate students’ conceptions of potential conflicts between ownership rights and environmental protection (OREP), and how these conceptions changed over the course of one semester

  • We focused on students in economics, law and political science keeping in mind their potential transformative social roles as decision makers and policy makers

  • It is clear that an overwhelming majority of the students believed that a potential conflict between ownership rights and environmental protection exists

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to explore Swedish social science undergraduate students’ conceptions of potential conflicts between ownership rights and environmental protection (OREP), and how these conceptions changed over the course of one semester. This study is underpinned by the theory of Kollmuss and Agyeman (2002) which states that barriers to pro-environmental behaviour are caused by both internal and external factors For this reason, the focus of this study is students’ societal beliefs and conceptions on OREP, which can be regarded as an internal factor. The driving force behind privatisation has been to transform the commons into capital and include them in the capitalistic economy based on the perceived need for capital accumulation Both sides in OREP are regulated by a multitude of laws. US right-wing claims that individual private property rights need to be defended against rules aimed at protecting the environment were explicitly expressed by the republican presidential candidates in 2016 (Goldstein and Hudak 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call