Abstract

Although China’s outward direct investment (CODI) has been ranked number one for 25 years among developing countries, between 1995 and 2019, increased more than 66 times, from about US$ 2.0 billion to US$136.91 billion, and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) is the most attractive world destination for foreign direct investment (FDI) due to its location advantages in terms of low labor cost, potential market size, CODI to ASEAN has been hovering at a very low level, accounting for only about 9.51% of China’s total outward direct investments. The relatively small CODI to ASEAN raises a question of how well the theories of FDI explain the interaction of China investors and ASEAN's location characteristics. This article tries to address the puzzle of a small share of CODI in ASEAN by investigating the determinants of CODI in ASEAN over the period 1995 to 2019. Evidence presented in this article indicates that the small CODI cannot be fully appreciated without understanding differences between CODI in ASEAN and that in EU, the latter attracting CODI at full speed. Empirical results suggest that the CODI in ASEAN was primarily motivated by natural resource and market access, and that in EU was technical and strategic assets oriented. The main purpose of Chinese investors to invest abroad is not to use their existing ownership advantages expanding overseas production, but to compensate their disadvantage and improve competitiveness to strengthen the domestic production. The small CODI in ASEAN thus is a result of China investors' strong interest in gaining raw materials, skilled labor, sale channels and potential market for its export rather than benefiting from cheap labor and ASEAN's export and employment-promotion FDI regime, poor infrastructure, containment attitude for Chinese investors, along with the political instabilities in ASEAN.

Highlights

  • China’s outward direct investment (CODI) has been ranked number one for 26 years among developing countries, between 1995 and 2019, increased more than 66 times, from about US$ 2.0 billion to US$136.91 billion [1], the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) is the most attractive world destination for foreign direct investment (FDI), CODI to ASEAN has been hovering at a very low level, accounting for only about 9.51% of China’s total outward direct investments1

  • The results showed that the random effects models (REM) model is more appropriate than the model fixed effects model (FEM)

  • The evidence indicates that the factors impeding CODI into ASEAN cannot be fully appreciated without understanding interactions of CODI motivation, and ASEAN's location characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

China’s outward direct investment (CODI) has been ranked number one for 26 years among developing countries, between 1995 and 2019, increased more than 66 times, from about US$ 2.0 billion to US$136.91 billion [1], the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) is the most attractive world destination for foreign direct investment (FDI), CODI to ASEAN has been hovering at a very low level, accounting for only about 9.51% of China’s total outward direct investments. For ASEAN, to keep large FDI inflows including CODI shall creating employment and increasing economic welfare of member states, and be necessary to upgrade its member countries’ industrial structure through raising their capacity to absorb, assimilate, modify and improve technology and management expertise embodied in CODI. For China, with access to a larger and more integrated market, realize its marginal industrial transfer and market exploration strategy; enhance its multinational corporation’s competitiveness; meet its domestic need in natural resources for its sustainable economic growth. The behavior of China investors in ASEAN is analyzed in comparison with those in EU, a CODI destination with the fastest CODI inflows growth rate, especially after 2008 global financial crisis. The main purpose of Chinese investors to invest abroad is not to use their existing ownership advantages expanding overseas production, but to compensate their disadvantage and improve competitiveness to strengthen China’s domestic production.

Pattern of CODI in ASEAN
Hypotheses and Model Specifications
Estimation Results
Summary and Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call