Potent P2Y12 inhibitors versus Clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Potent P2Y12 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular events but increase bleeding in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Elderly patients are at increased risk of bleeding and whether the benefit-risk ratio of potent P2Y12 inhibitors remains favorable is not known. To investigate the efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS. PUBMED and EMBASE were searched through July 2020 for randomized control trials (RCTs) or subgroup analyses of RCTs investigating potent P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) or clopidogrel in elderly (age ≥ 65 years) patients with ACS. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Our search identified 9 RCTs with a total of 10,792 elderly patients. When compared with clopidogrel, potent P2Y12 inhibitors had similar risk of MACE (hazard ratio (HR): 0.94; 95%; confidence interval (CI) [0.85-1.06], P = .31, I2 = 9%), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.89; 95% CI [0.74-1.07], P = .22, I2 = 29%), reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.82; 95% CI [0.68-0.98], P = .03, I2 = 16%) but increased the risk of major bleeding (HR: 1.27; 95% CI [1.04-1.56], P = .02, I2 = 0%). In a subgroup analysis, ticagrelor reduced all-cause mortality (HR: 0.73; 95% CI [0.55-0.98]) and cardiovascular death (HR: 0.70; 95% CI [0.54-0.90]) compared with clopidogrel. Among elderly patients with ACS, potent P2Y12 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death but increase bleeding with no difference in MACE or all-cause death when compared with clopidogrel. Further RCTs are needed to refine P2Y12 inhibitor selection for elderly patients with ACS.