Abstract
By way of a critical analysis of welfare reform initiatives in Massachusetts, the paper explores the complex interplay between federal- and state-level factors in welfare policy discourse and practice. I argue that, despite being represented as both home-grown and innovative, the recent package of reforms in Massachusetts is neither. Rather, it is the outcome of a self-inflicted hollowing out of the nation-state, coupled with a dramatic increase in federally orchestrated policy transfers between states, themselves anxious to appear active in the welfare reform process. The apparent consensus on work-based welfare reform is more a symptom of this structural context than it is an outcome of ideas that work at the local level. As a result, the postwelfare settlement in Massachusetts is an unstable one.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
