Abstract

In public relations and political communication, a spin is a form of propaganda achieved through knowingly presenting a biased interpretation of an event or issues. It is also the act of presenting narratives to influence public opinion about events, people or and ideas. In war time, various forms of spins are employed by antagonists to wear out the opponents and push their brigades to victory. During the Nigerian civil war, quite a number of these spins were dominant – for example GOWON (Go On With One Nigeria); “On Aburi We Stand”, “O Le Ku Ija Ore”. Post-war years presented different spins and fifty years after the war, different spins continue to push emerging narratives (e.g. “marginalization”, “restructuring”). This paper investigates and analyzes the different propaganda techniques and spins in the narratives of the Nigerian civil in the past five years through a content analysis of three national newspapers: The Nigerian Tribune, Daily Trust and Sun Newspapers. Findings confirm that propaganda and spins are not limited to war time, but are actively deployed in peace time. This development places additional challenge on journalists to uphold the canons of balance, truth and fairness in reporting sensitive national issues. The authors extend postulations that propaganda techniques, generally considered to be limited to war situations, are increasingly being used in post-war situations. Specifically, they highlight that journalists are becoming more susceptible to propaganda spins and this could affect the level of their compliance to the ethics of journalism.

Highlights

  • The place of Communication and the media in WarfareCommunication – the sharing of information, ideas, knowledge and meanings – is basic to existence

  • Propaganda techniques on Biafran war-related issues deployed through the Newspapers

  • The Police and the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leadership often engaged in the use of “direct order” and “unwarranted extrapolation”, while the IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu propagated lots of “disinformation” and “misinformation”

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Communication – the sharing of information, ideas, knowledge and meanings – is basic to existence. Many players in the war, such as military tacticians published aspects of these propaganda in their various accounts, but only systematic or scholarly investigations could properly unveil such carefully-planned and executed manipulated communications; especially their intents, purposes and techniques. This investigation, takes a different approach by looking beyond the surface of what the media reported; making deeper inquiry into the propaganda elements that might have nurtured what the media reported, after the war. What were the major sources of post-war propaganda information in the newspapers under review?

LITERATURE REVIEW
MATERIALS AND METHODS
15. Plain folks
42 Condemned
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call