Posture commonly and considerably modifies stenosis of left common iliac and left renal veins in women diagnosed with pelvic venous disorder

Abstract

ObjectivePelvic venous incompetence or pelvic congestion syndrome (commonly referred to as pelvic venous disorder [PVD]) is increasingly diagnosed, especially in multiparous women. This may be either primary or secondary to pelvic venous outflow obstruction—left common iliac vein (LCIV) or left renal vein (LRV) stenosis. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination performed in the supine position is commonly used for diagnosis of LRV and LCIV stenosis; however, body position may affect the cross-sectional area (CSA) of both of these veins during IVUS. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that postural changes may significantly affect the CSA of the LRV and LCIV. MethodsA single-arm, single-center cohort study of women suffering from PVD was performed at a tertiary hospital in Poland. It comprised consecutive patients with either pelvic vein reflux or suggestion of LCIV or LRV obstruction but no signs of deep venous thrombosis. IVUS examination of the iliac veins, inferior vena cava, and LRV was performed in the supine position. IVUS of the LRV and LCIV was performed also with a Valsalva maneuver and with patients lying on the left side and standing. A 60% CSA reduction was used as a cutoff value between significant and nonsignificant vein stenosis. ResultsA total of 41 women were examined. Significant stenosis of the LRV was seen in 22 patients (55%) supine but in only 4 (10%) patients studied when lying on the left side and in 27 (67.5%) patients studied while standing. Significant stenosis of the LCIV was seen in 26 supine patients (63.4%), in 8 lying on the left side (19.5%), and in 10 (24.4%) standing. ConclusionsPostural changes dramatically affect CSA of the LCIV and LRV and thus the degree of stenosis in women diagnosed with PVD. Stenosis found in patients while supine often disappears when the position is changed to lying on the left side or to standing. Therapeutic decisions based on assessment of CSA reduction in the supine position are likely to be inadequate.