Postural stability is a valid and meaningful disability metric in progressive MS with potential for use in neuroprotective therapy trials

Abstract

BackgroundBalance impairment is observed in up to 70% of people with MS (pwMS) and worsens with disease progression. Posturography using a force platform is the current gold standard in the measurement of balance. However, posturography has not been adequately studied or widely accepted for use as a disability outcome measure for pwMS. Importantly, the recent emergence of both successful and failed neuroprotective therapy trials in progressive MS has emphasised the need for new disability outcome measures for people with progressive MS. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical validity, reliability and feasibility of posturography as a disability metric in progressive MS. MethodsThis was a prospective cross-sectional study. We recruited 73 people with progressive MS (age 18–65 years, EDSS 3.5–6.0). Participants stood in the centre of a force platform, feet comfortably apart, under various conditions: (i) eyes open (EO), (ii) eyes closed (EC) – a single task, each lasting ninety seconds; and simultaneous EO with a cognitive test: (iii) N-Back, a three-minute test whereby participants were instructed to click the mouse when two identical letters were displayed consecutively on a screen, (iv) Sustained Attention Response Task, a five-minute test whereby participants were instructed to click the mouse for every number “1″ to “9″ except “3″ – i.e., dual-tasks. Additionally, we performed a battery of validated physical and cognitive outcome measures. Posturographic data was processed using Matlab. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. We used multiple linear regression modelling to determine whether significant univariate correlations between posturography and clinical metrics were independent of covariates that may influence the associations seen. A two-tailed significance level of 0.05 was used. ResultsOf 73 participants, mean age 52.4 (8.5) years, mean MS disease duration 13.8 (10.3) years, median EDSS 5.0 (IQR 4.0–6.0), 44 (60.4%) were female. EO-Path-Length independently predicted upper extremity function (9-Hole-Peg-Test) with a larger effect size (adjusted R2=20.0%, p = 0.001) than that for walking measures (Timed 25-Foot Walk, adjusted R2=1.6%, p = 0.01; Two-Minute Walk Test, adjusted R2=7.2%, p = 0.002), while controlling for age, disease duration, height, weight, and sex. The addition of EO-Mediolateral-Displacement to the MS Functional Composite (MSFC) created a four-component z-score that increased the variance explained for quality of life (QOL) by 62.1%. Postural stability was significantly lower with mediolateral vs anteroposterior direction of sway, removal of vision, increased body weight, male sex, and fampridine use. Postural stability improved during dual-tasks compared to EO single task. Posturography detected significant worsening of balance over a single prolonged stance. ConclusionPostural stability independently predicted a wide range of clinical metrics including upper extremity function, walking ability, cognition and QOL, therefore establishing construct and concurrent validity as a disability outcome measure for people with progressive MS. Additionally, posturography is a quantitative, non-invasive, quick-and-easy-to-administer, and highly sensitive device, demonstrating its high feasibility for use as a time- and resource-efficient disability metric in neuroprotective therapy trials for progressive MS.