Abstract
In the focus of this paper is a critical review of certain legal solutions related to the initiation and completion of the procedure for pronouncing the security measures of compulsory psychiatric treatment. The relationship between this special procedure and the general and simplified criminal procedure is reexamined and finds that issue of their transformation is not adequately solved. It is noted that main causes of the problem are inadequate legal terminology, a new concept of acquittal, as well as the wrong attitude about legal nature of the special procedure for pronouncing security measures of psychiatric sharacter.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
