Abstract
The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal represents international arbitrage in feld of basketball, which main task is solving disputable situations that arise in basketball. It has greatly contributed to regulating relations in professional basketball and it vastly helped in respecting signed contracts. As an independent body from FIBA, while still in cooperation, BAT enabled all interested parties to resolve disputes quickly, efficiently and cheaply. The procedure before the Tribunal is regulated by the BAT rules of arbitration, while proceedings is characterized by single arbitrator appointed by the BAT president, that the BAT arbitrators decide ex aequo et bono, and other rules aimed at shortening and simplifying the procedure. The Tribunal’s decision has res judicata effect and Tribunal has gradually built respectful jurisprudence so far. Although it is a recent date, Tribunal already has signifcant arbitration practice in its work so far. For all these reasons, this paper will analyze BAT arbitration rules and point out the most important points of this tribunal in resolving basketball disputes.
Highlights
solving disputable situations that arise in basketball
It has greatly contributed to regulating relations
it vastly helped in respecting signed contracts
Summary
U savremenom društvu sport predstavlja izuzetno popularnu društvenu aktivnost kojom se na različite načine bavi veliki broj ljudi i organizacija. Prisutnost marketinga i biznisa u sportu, omogućilo je velike količine novca, što je kao posledicu prouzrokovalo ekspanziju i profesionalizaciju sporta i njegovih aktera.[2] U skladu sa takvim tendencijama, javljaju se profesionalni sportisti koji za svoju primarnu i osnovnu delatnosti imaju bavljenje određenom granom sporta. Profesionalizacija sporta uslovila je i to da države i međunarodne organizacjie postanu zainteresovane za učešće i regulisanje sportskih aktivnosti. Pitanja koje postaju predmet zakonodavstva i pravne regulative su brojna, budući da bez njih profesionalni sport ne bi imao izgleda za opstanak.[3] Tako, pod pravno regulisanje sporta dolaze važna pitanja, kao što su statusna i procesna pitanja u vezi sa sportskim savezima, sportskim organizacijama, profesionalnim sportistima, ponašanjem na sportskim manifestacijama, anti-doping pravila i mnoge druge. Potreba da sport ne postane u potpunosti „državni“, uticala je i na to da sudstvo, kao jedna od tradicionalnih grana vlasti države, ostane uskraćeno za rešavanje svih sporova u sportu. Potreba da se sportske aktivnosti nesmetano obavljaju i brzo nastavljaju nakon nastalog spora i problema, uticale su na to da sudstvo, poznato po višegodišnjem i suviše formalnom rešavanju sporova, nema preveliki uticaj na „sportske sporove“
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
