Abstract

With the help of personal face-to-face interviews, a study was made of a group of Swedish tsunami survivors (n=21) who were non-bereaved and extremely exposed during the 2004 tsunami disaster in Southeast Asia. They all scored high on IES-22R and GHQ-12 three years post-disaster. The morbidity was very low: one survivor met criteria for PTSD and one for major depression.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD, after a natural disaster is generally lower than that documented in studies of man-made or technological disasters [1]

  • Measuring morbidity after major disasters by help of personal face-to-face interviews has earlier been used in very few Scandinavian studies [4,5,6]

  • The motivation for this study is the fact that the best way to diagnose a psychiatric disorder is by personal face-to-face interviews

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD, after a natural disaster is generally lower than that documented in studies of man-made or technological disasters [1]. In natural disasters it is more difficult to explicitly identify an obvious group of direct victims in that large areas are usually affected. As suggested by Galea et al [1], this fact could possibly explain the lower figures of PTSD. Measuring morbidity after major disasters by help of personal face-to-face interviews has earlier been used in very few Scandinavian studies [4,5,6]. Telephone interviews have been used for long-term follow-up studies [7,8]. The motivation for this study is the fact that the best (maybe only) way to diagnose a psychiatric disorder is by personal face-to-face interviews

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call