Abstract
In many plants, nitrogen represents 2 to 6% of dry matter, most of it being present in the form of amino acids, proteins, or nucleic acids. In these organic compounds, nitrogen exists in its most reduced state (oxidation state -3). It is taken up from the soil primarily in the form of nitrate (oxidation state +5). Thus, nitrate has to be reduced by plants at the expense of reductants such as NADH or NADPH, requiring 8 mol of electrons [or 4 mol of NAD(P)H] per mol of nitrate. Reduction is a two-step mechanism. The first step, reduction of nitrate to nitrite (+3 oxidation state), is catalyzed by assimilatory NR, which is an NAD(P)H-dependent cytosolic enzyme. Nitrite is further reduced to ammonia (-3 oxidation state) in the plastids of leaves or roots by NiR. There are at least two important reasons why plants must exert control on the velocity of nitrate reduction. First, it is an energy-consuming process. As shown above, 8 electrons are required to reduce one nitrate to ammonium, but only 4 electrons are needed to reduce CO2 to the carbohydrate level. Accordingly, a C/N ratio of 10 in the plant biomass (a value found in many herbaceous plants) indicates that about 20% of the photosynthetically produced electrons are consumed for nitrate reduction. Plants have to avoid 'luxury' consumption of nitrate and energy. Second, and perhaps more important, the primary product of nitrate reduction, nitrite (NO2-), is cytotoxic and regarded to be mutagenic as a result of the ability to diazotize amino groups. HNO2 is also a weak acid that, in its undissociated form, can easily penetrate biomembranes, thereby leading to acidification of cells or subcellular compartments. Thus, it makes sense if nitrate reduction is controlled in such a way that it does not exceed nitrite and ammonium consumption. In fact, even under rapidly fluctuating environmental conditions, nitrite levels in plant tissues remain low (below 0.1 mM). Apparently, the overall rates of nitrate and nitrite reduction always match the availability of energy and of carbohydrate, perhaps with the exception of some extreme conditions to be discussed below. Synchronization of nitrate reduction and carbon metabolism may occur at the level of transcription or translation of participating enzymes. The expression of NR genes at the transcription level is highly affected by nitrate, but also by light, plant hormones, and other factors (for review, see Solomonson and Barber, 1990; Lillo, 1994). The enzyme protein is rather short-lived, being degraded with a half-time of a few hours (Li and Oaks, 1993). This high turnover rate permits control of nitrate reduction, e.g. in response to nitrate availability (Li and Oaks, 1993). However, over the years, a number of situations have been described in which the level of extractable NRA did not match NR protein or the rate of nitrate reduction in vivo, indicating that yet other regulatory mechanisms might exist that modulate the catalytic activity of the protein (Lillo, 1994, and refs. cited therein). Such a newly discovered type of NR modulation, a reversible protein phosphorylation, will be described below.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.