Abstract
In Chapter Six, in the hands of feminist poststructuralist thinker Hélène Cixous the modernist motif of the conflict of Life vs. Form took on centrality. The notion of a “living writing” employed by Cixous has consequences in that it causes our interest to shift from language seen as an all englobing, even imprisoning, horizon to a principle of natality, within language, in spite of the symbolic order and the symbolic structure that fix the subject in the social order. The keyword for this chapter is “poststructuralism” and discussion considers its wider, far-reaching effects by expanding on the notion of a gift that is simultaneously a paternal donation, presenting it as a neglected aspect of poststructuralism. Poststructuralism usually means the rejection of an idea of reality independent of language. Yet, this chapter follows up Cixous’s recuperation, via Joyce’s modernism, of a beneficial principle in language beyond the Oedipal law. It enlists the help of Jean-Luc Marion’s work on Augustine, of contemporary theology, and of Jacques Lacan’s texts on psychoanalysis and religion to pursue the notion of a paternal donation beyond the Oedipal father and beyond the struggle for recognition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.