Abstract

This study investigates the influence of management over auditor selection decisions during a period in which audit committees have “direct responsibility” for auditor selection. We find that contrary to the intent of SOX, management continues to have significant influence over auditor selection and this is not mitigated by the presence of an apparently higher quality audit committee. As SOX presumes that management influence over auditor selection leads to negative outcomes, we also examine the impact that management influence has on proxies for subsequent auditor independence during the post-SOX period. We find that companies whose managers influence auditor selection are significantly less likely to receive going concern opinions, but no evidence of an impact on earnings management. We also find mixed evidence as to whether the relationship between management influence over auditor selection and subsequent audit quality is influenced by audit committee quality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.