Abstract

A hydrological ensemble prediction system is running operationally at the Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMI) for ten catchments in the Meuse basin. It makes use of the conceptual semi-distributed hydrological model SCHEME and the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble prediction system (ENS). An ensemble of 51 discharge forecasts is generated daily. We investigate the improvements attained through postprocessing the discharge forecasts, using the archived ECMWF reforecasts for precipitation and other necessary meteorological variables. We use the 5-member reforecasts that have been produced since 2012, when the horizontal resolution of ENS was increased to the N320 resolution (≈30 km over Belgium). The reforecasts were issued weekly, going back 20 years, and we use a calibration window of five weeks. We use these as input to create a set of hydrological reforecasts. The implemented calibration method is an adaption of the variance inflation method. The parameters of the calibration are estimated based on the hydrological reforecasts and the observed discharge. The postprocessed forecasts are verified based on a two-and-a-half year period of data, using archived 51 member ENS forecasts. The skill is evaluated using summary scores of the ensemble mean and probabilistic scores: the Brier Score and the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). We find that the variance inflation method gives a significant improvement in probabilistic discharge forecasts. The Brier score, which measures probabilistic skill for forecasts of discharge threshold exceedance, is improved for the entire forecast range during the hydrological summer period, and the first three days during hydrological winter. The CRPS is also significantly improved during summer, but not during winter. We conclude that it is valuable to apply the postprocessing method during hydrological summer. During winter, the method is also useful for forecasting exceedance probabilities of higher thresholds, but not for lead times beyond five days. Finally, we also note the presence of some large outliers in the postprocessed discharge forecasts, arising from the fact that the postprocessing is performed on the logarithmically transformed discharges. We suggest some ways to deal with this in the future for our operational setting.

Highlights

  • The benefit of using the results of meteorological ensemble prediction systems for hydrological purposes has been well established

  • We find that the variance inflation method gives a significant improvement in probabilistic discharge forecasts

  • We compute the Brier Skill Score (BSS) of the raw and postprocessed forecasts with the sample climatology as reference, and subsequently the Brier score of the raw forecast is used as reference to compute the BSS of the postprocessed ensemble forecast

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The benefit of using the results of meteorological ensemble prediction systems for hydrological purposes has been well established (see e.g., [1] for an extensive review). A large number of experimental and operational hydrological ensemble prediction systems (HEPS) have already been developed and tested (e.g., [2,3,4,5]). Precipitation forecasts, and forecasts of other meteorological fields, are used as input for a hydrological model to obtain hydrological ensemble predictions. Ensemble precipitation forecasts help to take into account uncertainties in future rainfall, but the uncertainty is certainly not fully captured. The use of raw precipitation ensembles induces biases and inaccuracies to the input of a hydrological model (errors in the forcing). The hydrological model itself induces further model errors

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call