Abstract

Women with a history of preeclampsia (hxPE) are at a four-fold higher risk for chronic hypertension after pregnancy compared with healthy pregnancy, but 'masked' hypertension cases are missed by clinical assessment alone. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is the reference-standard for confirmation of hypertension diagnoses or detection of masked hypertension outside of clinical settings, whereas home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) may represent a well-tolerated and practical alternative to ABPM in the postpartum period. The objectives of this study were to 1) assess concordance between ABPM and HBPM postpartum in women with a hxPE compared with healthy pregnancy controls and 2) evaluate HBPM in the detection of masked postpartum hypertension. Young women with a hxPE (N=26) and controls (N=36) underwent in-office, 24-h ABPM and 7-day HBPM 1-4years postpartum. Chronic hypertension was more prevalent among women with a hxPE by all three blood pressure measures, but the prevalence of masked postpartum hypertension did not differ (36% vs 37%, P=0.97). HBPM showed excellent agreement with ABPM (systolic: r=0.78, intraclass coefficient [ICC]=0.83; diastolic: r=0.82, ICC=0.88) and moderate concordance in classification of hypertension (κ=0.54, P<0.001). HBPM identified 21% of masked postpartum hypertension cases without false-positive cases, and HBPM measures among those with normotensive in-office readings could detect ABPM-defined masked hypertension (area under the curve [AUC]=0.88±0.06, P<0.0001). The findings of the present study indicate that HBPM may be a useful screening modality prior or complementary to ABPM in the detection and management of postpartum hypertension.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call