Postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy versus extended-field irradiation for early-stage cervical cancer patients with multiple pelvic lymph node metastases

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of postoperative pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy with that of extended-field irradiation (EFRT) in patients with FIGO Stage IA2–IIb cervical cancer with multiple pelvic lymph node metastases. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with FIGO Stage IA2–IIb cervical cancer who had undergone radical surgery between April 1997 and March 2008. Of these, 55 patients who demonstrated multiple pelvic lymph node metastases were treated postoperatively with pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy (n = 29) or EFRT (n = 26). Thirty-six patients with single pelvic node metastasis were also treated postoperatively with pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy. The recurrence rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the treatment groups. Results Pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy was significantly superior to EFRT with regard to recurrence rate (37.9% vs 69.2%, p = 0.0306), PFS (log-rank, p = 0.0236), and OS (log-rank, p = 0.0279). When the patients were treated with pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the patients with multiple lymph node metastases and those with single node metastases. With regards to grade 3–4 acute or late toxicities, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups. Conclusions Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy is superior to EFRT for treating patients with FIGO Stage IA2–IIb cervical cancer displaying multiple pelvic lymph node metastases.