Postoperative Jejunal Feeding and Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Abstract

Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are common, partly because of nutritional debilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early postoperative tube feeding on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy and determine the best method for delivering enteral feeding. A retrospective review of 180 consecutive patients undergoing Whipple operations from 1994 to 2000 was performed. Two nonrandomized patient groups were retrospectively studied: those with early postoperative tube feeding vs those with no planned feeding. Ninety‐eight patients (54%) received postoperative jejunal feeding, whereas 82 patients (46%) did not. Jejunal feeding was delivered via a bridled nasojejunal tube in 55 patients (56%) and a gastrojejunal tube in 43 (44%). Vomiting (10% vs 29%; p = .002) and use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (6% vs 27%; p < .0001) were less in the jejunal feeding group and rates of readmission (12% vs 27%; p = .022), early (52% vs 62%; p = .223) and late (12% vs 31%, p = .005) complications and infections (13% vs 20%, p = .014). Tube‐related complications occurred in 6 of 98 patients, all of which were associated with gastrojejunal tubes (p = .021). Early postoperative tube feeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with significantly less use of TPN and lower rates of readmission and complications. A bridled nasojejunal feeding tube appears to be a safe and reliable method of short‐term enteral feeding.