Abstract

A mandatory differential diagnosis between postoperative granulomas and tumor recurrence is required whenever space-occupying lesions are detected at the surgical site, few months after removal of the intracranial neoplasm, because these two pathologies can often mimic each other clinically, by imaging techniques and even macroscopically. Since history or signs of inflammation may be lacking, and neurological complaints are generally nonspecific, a thorough imaging investigation is usually the only way to diagnosis. Herein we discuss the pathological basis and timing of granuloma formation along with the imaging characteristics and nuclear medicine findings necessary to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of tumor recurrence. In conclusion, the high sensitivity of positron emission tomography and the wide availability of single photon emission tomography can identify certain parameters (isometabolism, uptake in macrophages, etc.) to support differential diagnosis between postoperative granulomas and tumor recurrence.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.