Abstract

The distal femur is the predominant site for benign bone tumours and a common site for fracture following tumour removal or cementation. However, the lack of conclusive assessment criterion for post-operative fracture risk and appropriate devices for cement augmentation are serious concerns. Hence, a validated biomechanical tool was developed to assess bone strength, depending on the size and location of artificially created tumorous defects in the distal femora. The mechanics of the bone–cement interface was investigated to determine the main causes of reconstruction failure. Based on quantitative-CT images, non-linear and heterogeneous finite element (FE) models of human cadaveric distal femora with simulated tumourous defects were created and validated using in vitro mechanical tests from 14 cadaveric samples. Statistical analyses demonstrated a strong linear relationship (R2 = 0.95, slope = 1.12) with no significant difference between bone strengths predicted by in silico analyses and in vitro tests (P = 0.174). FE analyses showed little reduction in bone strength until the defect was 35% or more of epiphyseal volume, and reduction in bone strength was less pronounced for laterally located defects than medial side defects. Moreover, the proximal end of the cortical window and the most interior wall of the bone–cement interface were the most vulnerable sites for reconstruction failure.

Highlights

  • The distal femur is the predominant site for benign bone tumours and a common site for fracture following tumour removal or cementation

  • Accuracy and precision of the finite element (FE) models were evaluated using the models included in the Tuning group (TG) and Evaluation group (EG), respectively

  • Damage at the bone–cement interface was investigated by identifying regions of high stresses reaching the critical stress at damage initiation, i.e., ­t0

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The distal femur is the predominant site for benign bone tumours and a common site for fracture following tumour removal or cementation. There remains a great need for an accurate and validated biomechanical study on post-operative fracture risk assessment, for defects in the epiphyseal region of the distal femur, the most vulnerable site for primary bone tumours, such as ­GCTs6. Such a biomechanical approach should quantitatively determine the necessity and the method of defect reconstruction following tumour removal, which is a controversial issue among ­specialists[6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call