Abstract

This article considers how postmodernist thought can illuminate the doctrine of judicial notice. Specifically, it considers how postmodernist critiques of empiricism have challenged the idea of ‘indisputable’ facts which inform judicial decision-making. It argues that, while the practical realities of judicial administration must be borne in mind, increased sensitivity to the arbitrary nature of notorious facts will lead to more accountable decision-making.

Highlights

  • In 2006, Susan Crennan delivered a speech entitled ‘Postmodernism and the Law’

  • Crennan’s thesis was that ‘postmodern social critique ... has an influence which has gone beyond the universities and is certainly to be felt in the law’

  • Tasked with explaining cultural theory in the wake of Marx to a group of Herbert Smith Freehills litigators, she was perhaps justified in taking a broad-strokes approach. Notwithstanding, her speech stands as an important call, largely unacknowledged within conventional legal circles, for interrogation of the law’s doctrines and institutions within the framework of postmodernist thought

Read more

Summary

What is judicial notice?

Judicial notice is the principle that a court can find that a fact exists, despite that fact not being proven under the rules of. Judicial notice has limited scope with regard to adjudicative facts since a trial turns on the evidence provided for and against the points in issue. Isaacs J proposed two ‘sub-classes’ of legislative facts.. Isaacs J proposed two ‘sub-classes’ of legislative facts.9 The first includes those which the judge decides after independent inquiry. The process behind these facts is generally more visible. The second includes facts which judges rely on without the need for further inquiry. This covers any fact which is ‘so generally known that every ordinary person may be reasonably presumed to be aware of it’.11. This article focuses on this second class of notorious fact, since they are relied upon in judgments without any stated justification

Judicial notice is necessary but dangerous
Is common knowledge common?
The empire of common knowledge
The postmodernist critique of knowledge
Postmodernism and judicial notice
The future of judicial knowledge
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.