Abstract

While Richard Rorty cannot be considered a ‘real’ sociologist, he provides a significant contribution the methodology of the social sciences. Rorty’s critical pragmatism is an important component of postmodern sociology. Always critical and sometimes even too flaunty about its novelty, postmodern mindset develops within labyrinths of interdisciplinary matter. In such a confusing polyphonic and conceptually mixed surrounding common theoretical contrapositions, provisions and concepts soften their strictness. Postmodern social criticism, which sooner or later undergoes the necessity to speak not only denying but also to use the stating voice, must ask: if there is nothing truthful to be said, why is it needed and, if yes, how is it possible not to lose voice?

Highlights

  • Kaip bevadintume niidienes visuomenes biiklq - ar postmodernybe, ar velyvuoju modernu - viena jau nebekelia abejoniy: sociologijos mokslas, kaip turintis labiau ar menkiau patikimq teorini pamatq, patiria nematytq metodologinq maiSatj, arba, kaip jprasta sakyti, legitimacijos "krizq".

  • Taigi nors Rorty, kaip jau mineta, negali biiti laikomas "tikru" sociologu tradicine Sio termino prasme, jo neabejotinai svariai prisideta mqstant ne tik niidienos sociologo irlarba filosofo pilietine bei doroving laikysenq, bet, kas itin svarbu, ir metodologinius socialines teorijos apmatus.

  • Lyotardq tvirtai sieja su Habermasu ir kartu lemtingai skiria nuo Rorty kaip tik estetinio, episteminio, socialinio, politinio arba kulturinio filosofijos reikSmingumo pripaiinimas, t.y. prielaida, kad filosofine iiiira, biidama ypatingu "kalbos iaidimu", gali ir netgi privalo atskleisti specifinq, vien tik filosofiniu ivilgsniu pastebimq tikrovq.

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kaip bevadintume niidienes visuomenes biiklq - ar postmodernybe, ar velyvuoju modernu - viena jau nebekelia abejoniy: sociologijos mokslas, kaip turintis labiau ar menkiau patikimq teorini pamatq, patiria nematytq metodologinq maiSatj, arba, kaip jprasta sakyti, legitimacijos "krizq". Taigi nors Rorty, kaip jau mineta, negali biiti laikomas "tikru" sociologu tradicine Sio termino prasme, jo neabejotinai svariai prisideta mqstant ne tik niidienos sociologo irlarba filosofo pilietine bei doroving laikysenq, bet, kas itin svarbu, ir metodologinius socialines teorijos apmatus.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call