Abstract

Postmating but prezygotic (PMPZ) interactions are increasingly recognized as a potentially important early‐stage barrier in the evolution of reproductive isolation. A recent study described a potential example between populations of the same species: single matings between Drosophila montana populations resulted in differential fertilisation success because of the inability of sperm from one population (Vancouver) to penetrate the eggs of the other population (Colorado). As the natural mating system of D. montana is polyandrous (females remate rapidly), we set up double matings of all possible crosses between the same populations to test whether competitive effects between ejaculates influence this PMPZ isolation. We measured premating isolation in no‐choice tests, female fecundity, fertility and egg‐to‐adult viability after single and double matings as well as second‐male paternity success (P2). Surprisingly, we found no PMPZ reproductive isolation between the two populations under a competitive setting, indicating no difficulty of sperm from Vancouver males to fertilize Colorado eggs after double matings. While there were subtle differences in how P2 changed over time, suggesting that Vancouver males’ sperm are somewhat less competitive in a first‐male role within Colorado females, these effects did not translate into differences in overall P2. Fertilisation success can thus differ dramatically between competitive and noncompetitive conditions, perhaps because the males that mate second produce higher quality ejaculates in response to sperm competition. We suggest that unlike in more divergent species comparisons, where sperm competition typically increases reproductive isolation, ejaculate tailoring can reduce the potential for PMPZ isolation when recently diverged populations interbreed.

Highlights

  • Reproductive isolation is traditionally classified into premating and postmating isolation, which have been extensively studied (Coyne and Orr 2004)

  • Postmating but prezygotic (PMPZ) isolation in animals has been measured between species pairs (Metz et al 1994; Shaw et al 1994; Price et al 2001; Matute and Coyne 2010; Manier et al 2013b; Sweigart 2010; Sagga and Civetta 2011; Ahmed-Braimah and McAllister 2012), while studies between populations of one species are more rare (Alipaz et al 2001; Brown and Eady 2001; Fricke and Arnqvist 2004; Nosil and Crespi 2006; Jennings et al 2011, 2014; Firman and Simmons 2014), even though these are more relevant to the initiation of reproductive barriers

  • Colorado females mated likely with Colorado males (76 of 96) and Vancouver males (86 of 98) (v2 = 2.43, df = 1, P = 0.12)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reproductive isolation is traditionally classified into premating and postmating isolation, which have been extensively studied (Coyne and Orr 2004). PMPZ isolation mechanisms operate at the level of gametic and/or reproductive protein interactions. They may involve sperm motility (Gregory and Howard 1994), sperm storage (Price et al 2001), differential female use of stored sperm (Manier et al 2013b), interactions a 2016 The Authors.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call