Abstract
Death was not only a structural principle for Jacques Derrida. There is a double difficulty in attempting to do justice to Emmanuel Levinas's work on responsibility to the other. Derrida's long essay on Levinas was at once generous in drawing attention to the importance of Levinas's work and exacting in its critique of some of that work's central claims and methods. Derrida's later essay showed his fidelity to Levinas through infidelity, by means of a careful and respectful questioning of the older writer's mode of argumentation and his privileging of the masculine. Derrida's conviction that the third arrives without waiting and thus forestalls the violence of the other signals both his fidelity to his dead friend's thought and, as itself a mark of the third complicating that relation, his willingness to let it be remade by his own inventiveness – though Derrida, of course, does not put it in this way.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.