Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in extremely low birth weight infants: Ommaya reservoir vs. ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and initial surgery in infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) by comparing infants who were treated with a subcutaneous cerebrospinal fluid reservoir (Ommaya reservoir = CSF_R) with infants who primarily received a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS).MethodInclusion criteria were infants born between January 2006 and June 2014 who had a diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and underwent surgical intervention for hydrocephalus.ResultsTwenty-five infants, with a median gestational age (GA) of 26.5 (28 ± 4) weeks and a median birth weight (BW) of 980 g (1205 ± 837), were included. The median umbilical artery pH (UApH) was 7.30 (7.20 ± 0.25). The median Apgar score at 10 min was 8 (7.4 ± 2). Twenty-five peri- and postnatal adverse events were encountered preoperatively. The IVH grades were grade II (n = 1), grade III (n = 17), grade IV (n = 6), and unknown grade (n = 1). Primary treatment consisted of CSF_R (n = 18) or VPS (n = 7) placement. There was a statistically significant difference between the postnatal ages of infants with CSF_R (32.5 days; 42 ± 28) and infants with VPS (163 days; 161 ± 18). Furthermore, we found a difference regarding GA but not BW between both groups. Arrest of PHH with shunt independence occurred in two infants from the CSF_R group (11 %).ConclusionsIn the present study, early insertion of CSF_R allowed stabilization of the infants and thus postponement of permanent VPS insertion. However, in a subgroup of patients, PHH develops over a more prolonged course, and VPS insertion can be performed initially without the need for CSF_R.