Abstract

Weighted least-squares estimation methods are often used in the analysis of inter-laboratory comparison data. In classical statistics, least-squares methods can be justified in terms of properties of sampling distributions. However, not all distributions associated with laboratory results can be regarded sampling distributions and, for these cases, least-squares methods are a less straightforward to justify. Furthermore, they can give results that differ significantly from a Bayesian analysis. We illustrate these differences for the case in which the results of the laboratories are derived from repeated measurements.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call