Posterior cruciate–sacrificing versus posterior cruciate–substituting total knee arthroplasty: A study of clinical and functional outcomes in matched patients

Abstract

Since the introduction of the Total Condylar Prosthesis (TCP) in 1974, concomitant improvements in surgical technique and prosthetic design have occurred. The individual effects of each of these variables have not been investigated, however. This study evaluates 2 different knee designs using the same operative technique by a single surgeon. All primary total knee arthroplasties performed between 1986 and 1989 were entered into a database of 2 cohorts, TCP and Press Fit Condylar (PFC) knees, matched for age, gender, body weight, and diagnosis. Follow-up data within 12 months of each other were used, evaluating patients clinically and using a self-administered questionnaire. In each cohort, 74 knees were matched by these criteria. Follow-up time was 4.04 and 4.45 years for the TCP and PFC cohorts. Range of motion averaged 107° and 112° for the TCP and PFC cohorts. This difference was statistically significant. Total knee score and functional score improved significantly. Anterior knee pain was present in 9 TCP and 3 PFC knees. Lateral release was performed in 30 TCP and 18 PFC knees. The PFC showed an advantage in ROM, stair function, anterior knee pain, and use of lateral release. Both designs showed comparable pain relief and walking ability.