Abstract
Purpose To compare the incidence and severity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between AcrySof® MA30BA acrylic (Alcon) and PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB silicone (AMO) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Setting Outpatient Cataract Surgery Center, TLC Eyecare and Laser Center, Jackson, Michigan, USA. Methods AcrySof and PhacoFlex II IOLs were implanted in fellow eyes of 156 patients requiring bilateral cataract extraction. The patients were followed for a mean of approximately 3 years for the incidence and severity of PCO and the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates. Results Of the 63 eyes that were free of PCO throughout the study, 42 had the AcrySof IOL and 21 had the PhacoFlex II IOL. Of eyes that developed PCO, the mean severity in the AcrySof group was 16% less than that in the PhacoFlex II group. Of the 50 eyes that had an Nd:YAG capsulotomy, 17 were in the AcrySof group and 33 were in the PhacoFlex II group. All differences between groups were statistically significant ( P<.05). Conclusion The AcrySof MA30BA IOL was associated with less PCO proliferation and thus fewer Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomies than the PhacoFlex II SI-40NB IOL.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.