Abstract
This study provides new information on the evaluation of the lung dose calculation algorithms as a function of the relative electron density of lung, ρe,lung . Doses calculated using the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) and adaptive convolution (AC) algorithm in lung with the Pinnacle3 system were compared to those calculated using the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation (EGSnrc-based code). Three groups of lung phantoms, namely, "Slab", "Column" and "Cube" with different ρe,lung (0.05-0.7), positions, volumes and shapes of lung in water were used. 6 and 18MV photon beams with 4×4 and 10×10cm2 field sizes produced by a Varian 21EX Linac were used in the MC dose calculations. Results show that the CCC algorithm agrees well with AC to within ±1% for doses calculated in the lung phantoms, indicating that the AC, with 3-4 times less computing time required than CCC, is a good substitute for the CCC method. Comparing the CCC and AC with MC, dose deviations are found when ρe,lung are ⩽0.1-0.3. The degree of deviation depends on the photon beam energy and field size, and is relatively large when high-energy photon beams with small field are used. For the penumbra widths (20%-80%), the CCC and AC agree well with MC for the "Slab" and "Cube" phantoms with the lung volumes at the central beam axis (CAX). However, deviations >2mm occur in the "Column" phantoms, with two lung volumes separated by a water column along the CAX, using the 18MV (4×4cm2 ) photon beams with ρe,lung ⩽0.1.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.