Poster 128: The Effect of Meniscotibial Ligament Disruption and Repair on Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Forces

Abstract

Objectives: Meniscal injuries occur in as many as 1% of active people, and while outcomes for tears at the posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) are well cited, the risk factors for injury have room for greater understanding. Incidence of disruption to the meniscotibial ligament (MTL) is correlated to occurrence of PMMR tears, suggesting that disruption to the MTL may increase forces at the PMMR and put the PMMR at greater risk of injury. The effect of an MTL disruption and repair on three-dimensional forces at the PMMR is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if MTL insufficiency alters forces at the PMMR., if a tenodesis procedure can restore PMMR forces to that of an MTL intact state, and to determine how knee flexion angle impacts PMMR root forces in the MTL intact and cut states. We hypothesize that all shear forces will increase following MTL disruption. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (Average age: 53.2 years) were tested in three conditions (Intact, MTL Cut, MTL Tenodesis). Specimens were dissected down to the knee capsule with ligaments intact. A 3D load cell construct (Figure 1) was installed inside the tibia such that 3D forces of the PMMR could be measured when the joint was loaded. Each specimen was mounted to a materials testing machine (Instron) via a custom fixture that allowed the specimen flexion angle to be changed in 30 degree increments. The specimen was first loaded to 500 N of compression with 0 N-m of torque, then to 5 N-m of internal torque with 50 N of compression, and finally to 5 N-m of external torque with 50 N of compression. 3D forces at the PMMR were recorded for all loading sequences, and the process was repeated for each flexion angle (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°). PMMR forces along each axis (compression- tension, anterior-posterior shear, and medial-lateral shear) were compared across MTL testing states across flexion angles using linear mixed modelling. Results: When the joint was loaded in compression, MTL Cut state significantly increased compression of the PMMR (p = 0.0368), and the Tenodesis state did not significantly restore tension-compression forces of the PMMR (Intact→Tenodesis: p = 0.008)(Figure 1). When the joint was loaded in external rotation, the MTL Cut State significantly increased compression (p < 0.0001), significantly decreased anterior shear (p = 0.0003), and, in high flexion angles, significantly decreased ML shear forces of the PMMR (Figure 1). The Tenodesis state did not significantly restore tension-compression (Intact→Tenodesis: p < 0.0001) or AP forces (Intact→Tenodesis: p = 0.0002) of the PMMR (Figure 1). Conclusions: The key finding of this study is that MTL disruption increases compression forces and decreases AP shear forces seen at the root when the joint is loaded in compression and external rotation. These findings indicate that the intact MTL protects the PMMR from compression and shear loads during movements where the joint is loaded in compression and external rotation, movements that are clinically reported to put the knee joint at risk of PMMR injury. The authors believe these relationships are observed because the MTL may play a role in maintaining meniscal hoop stresses, which converts joint compression loads into tension and shear forces along the meniscal attachment points. When the MTL is disrupted, the other meniscal attachment points, the PMMR included, see elevated compression loads as a result. This is the first study to measure 3D forces at the PMMR, a necessary capability to assess PMMR injury risk. It is notable that the tenodesis procedure performed in this study did not restore PMMR forces. Future studies should develop improved centralization or tenodesis procedures to better restore PMMR forces and decrease likelihood for PMMR injury after MTL disruption.