Postdisciplinary Liaisons: Science Studies and the Humanities

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessCase Studies IPostdisciplinary Liaisons: Science Studies and the HumanitiesMario BiagioliMario Biagioli Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Critical Inquiry Volume 35, Number 4Summer 2009The Fate of Disciplines Edited by James Chandler and Arnold I. Davidson Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/599586 Views: 392Total views on this site Citations: 27Citations are reported from Crossref © 2009 by The University of Chicago. 0093‐1896/09/3504‐0004$10.00. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Francisco Martínez Límites etnográficos: una aproximación antropológica en tres experimentos creativos, Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología , no.4747 (Apr 2022): 97–118.https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda47.2022.05Aldo Ocampo González Epistemología de la educación inclusiva, Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales 12, no.22 (Aug 2021): 438.https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.4066Ana Cristina Roque, Cecilia Veracini, Cristina Brito Shaping Landscapes: Thinking On the Interactions between People and Nature in Inter- and Postdisciplinary Narratives, Humanities 10, no.22 (May 2021): 75.https://doi.org/10.3390/h10020075Eleni Michalopoulou, Aisling Tierney, Ed Atkins, Tabitha Stanmore, Lin Ma, Natalie Jester, Chris Preist Development and Delivery of a Sustainable Development Unit in UK Universities: A Higher Education’s Guide for Future Sustainability Leaders, (May 2021): 465–481.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63399-8_30Dan Lockton, Laura Forlano, John Fass, Lisa Brawley Thinking With Things: Landscapes, Connections, and Performances as Modes of Building Shared Understanding, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 40, no.66 (Nov 2020): 38–50.https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2020.3027591Noortje Marres, Sarah de Rijcke From indicators to indicating interdisciplinarity: A participatory mapping methodology for research communities in-the-making, Quantitative Science Studies 1, no.33 (Sep 2020): 1041–1055.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00062Francisco Martínez Introduction, Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 29, no.22 (Sep 2020): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.3167/ajec.2020.290201Julien Wacquez Les réalismes de l’anneau-monde, Socio , no.1313 (Dec 2019): 155–180.https://doi.org/10.4000/socio.7915Kate Maxwell, Paul Benneworth The construction of new scientific norms for solving Grand Challenges, Palgrave Communications 4, no.11 (May 2018).https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0105-9Pal Ahluwalia The Sikh faith and its encounter with the humanities within the contemporary secular university, Sikh Formations 14, no.22 (Sep 2018): 212–220.https://doi.org/10.1080/17448727.2018.1503630Amanda Haynes In Support of Disciplinarity in Teaching Sociology, Teaching Sociology 45, no.11 (Sep 2016): 54–64.https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16664397Rolf Lidskog, Claire Waterton Anthropocene – a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?, Environmental Sociology 2, no.44 (Oct 2016): 395–406.https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841Joseph Murphy, Sarah Parry, John Walls The EPSRC’s Policy of Responsible Innovation from a Trading Zones Perspective, Minerva 54, no.22 (Mar 2016): 151–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9294-9Peter Osborne Problematizing Disciplinarity, Transdisciplinary Problematics, Theory, Culture & Society 32, no.5-65-6 (Jul 2015): 3–35.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415592245Matt Vidal, Paul Adler, Rick Delbridge When Organization Studies Turns to Societal Problems: The Contribution of Marxist Grand Theory, Organization Studies 36, no.44 (Apr 2015): 405–422.https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615575948Mauro Bergonzi, Francesco Fiorentino, Domenico Fiormonte, Laura Fortini, Ugo Fracassa, Michele Lucantoni, Massimo Marraffa, Teresa Numerico The New Humanities Project—Reports from Interdisciplinarity, Humanities 3, no.33 (Sep 2014): 415–441.https://doi.org/10.3390/h3030415Deb Verhoeven Doing the Sheep Good, (Jan 2014): 206–220.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137337016_14Rick Delbridge Promising Futures: CMS, Post-Disciplinarity, and the New Public Social Science, Journal of Management Studies 51, no.11 (Sep 2013): 95–117.https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12052Alessandro Duranti On the future of anthropology: Fundraising, the job market and the corporate turn, Anthropological Theory 13, no.33 (Sep 2013): 201–221.https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613492089Priya Venkatesan Hays Epistemic Cross Talk:, Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 15, no.22 (Sep 2013): 221–239.https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.15.2.0221Geoff Cooper A Disciplinary Matter: Critical Sociology, Academic Governance and Interdisciplinarity, Sociology 47, no.11 (Feb 2013): 74–89.https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512444812Jennifer Summit Renaissance Humanism and the Future of the Humanities, Literature Compass 9, no.1010 (Oct 2012): 665–678.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2012.00921.xJessica Riskin Introduction: A Mingled Yarn, (Jan 2012): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230338029_1Sander L. Gilman Representing Health and Illness: Thoughts for the 21st century, Journal of Medical Humanities 32, no.22 (Jan 2011): 69–75.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-010-9131-3 By John V. Pickstone and Michael Worboys Introduction John V. Pickstone and Michael Worboys, Isis 102, no.11 (Jul 2015): 97–101.https://doi.org/10.1086/658658 By Colin Milburn Modifiable Futures: Science Fiction at the Bench Colin Milburn, Isis 101, no.33 (Jul 2015): 560–569.https://doi.org/10.1086/655793 Bibliography, (): 319–339.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373391-013