Postcolonial Studies after 9/11: A Response to Ali Behdad

Abstract

Ali Behdad's essay is situated at the intersection of postcolonial studies, American studies, and ethnic studies. It highlights the need to counter exceptionalist readings of the events of 9/11 by using a critical historicism that can simultaneously address the new turn Islamophobia and Orientalism have taken and explore their linkages to older modes of racialization. The point of Behdad's essay is less to offer a general theory of critical historicism than to demonstrate its strategic uses in countering “the amnesiac production and reproduction of race and ethnicity.” This intervention traverses fields that, while sharing concerns about nationalism, minoritization, imperialism, and globalization, have often explored them in disparate historical and geographical contexts. The overlapping concerns between these fields have not often generated conversations that bring them into strenuous contestation and exchange with each other. Given the asymmetrical intellectual flows that define relationships between ethnic studies and postcolonial studies, scholars from ethnic studies have been more intensively engaged in refitting postcolonial theory to engage racialization and its entanglements with shifting modes of US imperialism than have postcolonial studies scholars in addressing the specificities of US imperialism or the interconnected histories of racialization in the US. For scholars of postcoloniality, the diaspora model, with its emphasis on linkages between migrants and their homelands, has been the predominant model for thinking through the entailments of race in the metropolis. The westward movement of US expansion, its extension into the Asia-Pacific region, the hemispheric circuits linking it to Latin America and the Caribbean, and its belatedness to European imperialism have placed it outside the primary sites of postcolonial theory, namely, Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East. In contrast, American studies have, for nearly two decades, been intensively engaged in exploring the contours of US imperialism and its divergence from European models of territorial domination. Thus, Behdad's essay builds on existing projects in ethnic studies and American studies. However, from the perspective of postcolonial studies, his emphasis on immigration and nation formation in a white-settler colony represents a re-orientation from European to US hegemony and from diasporics and cosmopolitans to immigrants and minorities.