Abstract

Among the major urban projects arising out of post-war reconstruction in Lebanon is the Elyssar project, planned to reorganize the southwestern suburb of Beirut—an area largely inhabited by lower-income Shiite Muslims and known for its illegal housing and informal commercial activities. The dynamics of the Elyssar project bring together three sets of actors: the state and the two main Shiite political actors, Amal and Hezbollah. This paper uses the concept of governance, with a focus on issues of transparency and negotiation, to examine the dynamics of relations within the board of the Elyssar project and between those actors and the residents of the targeted neighbourhoods. At first reading, the project seems to epitomize good urban governance, since state agencies and political actors representing the interests of the residents are involved in project decisionmaking and implementation. However, this paper shows that, in reality, these governance processes are characterized by controlled access to inform...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.