Abstract

Background Right Hemicolectomy (RHC) is a common procedure for various right-sided colon pathologies; cancer colon or terminal ileum, perforated appendix with unhealthy cecal base, traumatic injuries and other less commonly indications. Ileo-colic anastomosis is the preferred next step following resection of the diseased segment, however, in certain situations, ileostomy (IL) and mucus fistula (MF) may be done due to excessive soiling or post-leakage of ileo-colic an astomosis or due to bad general condition of patient at this situation. Analternative approach can be done in such cases, which is the construction of aside-to side ileo-colic anastomosis which is then brought out in the right abdominal wall anastoma, so that reconstruction can be done with out midline laparotomy. Here, in our study we did a short term comparison between two groups of patients underwent ileosto my with mucousfistula.The first under went posterior wall anastomosis and the second without. Aim of Study Compare between Two groups of patients post RHC; one underwent ILM Group A: underwent ileostomy and mucusfistula with posterior wall anastomosis. Group B: operated up on by ileostomy and mucus fistula without posterior wall anastomosis. Results Twenty-three patients underwent ileostomy and mucus fistula through single skin opening with posterior wall anastomosis, while 25 patients were through 2 skin openings without posterior wall anastomosis. No statistically significant difference between both groups regarding postoperative stoma-related complications. Restoration of continuity showed significantly more rate of wound infection in-case of ileostomy and mucus fistula through separate skin openings that’s attributed to midline laparotomy. Conclusion Ileostomy and mucus fistula through single skin opening with posterior wall anastomosis, is associated with similar complications rate to separate skin openings ileostomy and mucus fistula, however, its less risk of wound related SSI along with its ramifications as wound dehiscence and incisional hernia, due to avoidance of midline laparotomy when restoring bowel continuity is a worthy advantage.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.