Abstract

Selective laser melting (SLM) enables the production of metal complex shapes that are difficult or impossible to obtain with conventional production processes. However, the attainable surface quality is insufficient for most applications; thus, a secondary finishing is frequently required. Barrel finishing is an interesting candidate but is often applied without consistent criteria aimed at finding processing parameters. This work presents a methodology based on Bagnold number evaluation and bed behavior diagram, developed on experimental apparatus with different charges and process parameters. The experimentation on an industrial machine and the profilometric analysis allowed the identification of appropriate process parameters and charge media for finishing the investigated materials (Ti6Al4V and Inconel718). Two case studies, characterized by complex shapes, were considered, and consistent surface measures allowed understanding the capability of the technology.

Highlights

  • Selective laser melting (SLM), which belongs to the category of powder bed fusion [1], is one of the fastest growing additive manufacturing (AM) technologies globally

  • SLM plays an important role in producing complex parts, but the obtainable surface quality remains a crucial aspect

  • A systematic approach based on number allowed determining the feasibility regions for Barrel finishing (BF) operations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Selective laser melting (SLM), which belongs to the category of powder bed fusion [1], is one of the fastest growing additive manufacturing (AM) technologies globally It allows producing metal components with complex geometry, resulting in severely reduced design and production times of the entire productive process [2]. SLM permits producing fully dense parts in a direct way, thereby saving on raw material with respect to subtractive technologies [6] It promotes the possibility of producing customized metal components in a cost-effective manner, allowing great flexibility in production; the design freedom allows improving the efficiency [7] and the functionality [8,9] of

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.