Abstract

The bonded lingual retainer (BLR) is considered a favorable choice for retaining lower incisors’ alignment post-orthodontic treatment; however, it may cause some unwanted effects such as inadvertent tooth movement and torque changes. These often result in gingival recession (Miller class III-type) with exposure of the root surface, which compromises the esthetics and hinders the comfort of the patient. Fifteen post-orthodontic patients presenting Miller class III-type recessions with BLR were examined. Two protocols were used: the first included the removal of the BLR prior to surgery and the second included only a surgical approach. All patients underwent the same surgery of a modified tunnel double papilla procedure for root coverage. The gingival recession was measured using a dental probe before, and three to six months post-surgery. The average improvement in recession depth was significantly greater (p = 0.008) for the protocol that included removal of the BLR (4.0 ± 0.83 mm) with an improvement of 87.2% as compared to the second protocol that showed an improvement of 43.8% (1.88 ± 1.29 mm). Removing the BLR prior to surgery is beneficial for predictable root coverage in post-orthodontic Miller class III recessions.

Highlights

  • Long-term stability is one of the main challenges of orthodontic treatment [1,2]

  • The cases were divided into two groups according to the protocol used: the first included removal of the bonded lingual retainer (BLR) prior to surgery and a removable retainer was applied to the patient three months after surgery for night-use only (Figure 1)

  • Out of the 15 cases that were analyzed, the first protocol that included removal of the BLR was applied to six patients and the second protocol was applied to the other nine patients (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Long-term stability is one of the main challenges of orthodontic treatment [1,2]. Several protocols were suggested to maintain the alignment of mandibular canines and incisors at the end of the active phase of orthodontic treatment [3,4]. The protocol of choice for most orthodontists is the bonded lingual retainer (BLR) (reported by 83% of the orthodontists asked) [5], since it is invisible, independent of patient cooperation and is aimed at lifelong retention. BLR follow up and maintenance by either the orthodontist or the treating general dental practitioner is crucial for long-term stability of the orthodontic treatment result and the health of the supporting periodontal tissues [8]. All patients must be informed at the end of treatment about the need for frequent follow up visits as long as the BLR is bonded

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call