Post-Operative Complications after Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques

Abstract

Category: Sports; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Acute Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) can be treated surgically through either open repair or minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS). While the relative complication rates between these techniques, including wound dehiscence, re-rupture, and sural nerve injury, have been debated, many studies demonstrate no significant difference between these two approaches. In this study, we conducted a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare the incidence and timing of complications between open and MIS repair of acute ATRs and examine factors that may influence these rates. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of patients (≥18 years) who underwent surgical intervention for acute ATR within a four-week period following injury, with a minimum follow-up of three months. Data on demographic variables, type of surgical procedure (MIS or open approach), and the occurrence and timing of postoperative complications were collected. Postoperative complications were classified as venous thromboembolism (VTE), re-rupture, surgical site infecti+D2on (SSI), wound dehiscence, and sural nerve injury.The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to compare the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of survivor functions. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to determine predictors of complications. Results: In total, 417 patients were included in the final analysis. The MIS group had a higher proportion of patients with tobacco use. Fifty-two complications in 50 patients were recorded (Table 1). We found no significant difference in the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. However, Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that body mass index (BMI) was a significant predictor of re-ruptures (HR 1.2, 95% CI = 1.05–1.4) and that surgical delay was found to be a significant predictor of wound dehiscence (HR 1.2, 95% CI =1.01–1.3) and sural nerve injury (HR 1.2, 95% CI =1.1–1.3). A surgical delay of more than 2 weeks was noted to have a positive likelihood ratio of 2.3 for wound dehiscence and 3.1 for sural nerve injury. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that MIS and open repair techniques for acute ATRs demonstrate comparable complication rates. However, patients with elevated BMI exhibit an increased risk of re-rupture. Those with surgical delay beyond two weeks have an elevated likelihood of wound dehiscence and sural nerve injury, presumptively due to associated scaring and the requisite tissue manipulation. Surgeons and patients may consider these variables when formulating a surgical treatment plan.