Post-neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

Abstract

Achieving a pathologic complete response as a result of neoadjuvant treatment is associated with improved prognosis in breast cancer. The CREATE-X trial showed a significant survival improvement with capecitabine treatment of patients with residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the KATHERINE trial demonstrated a significant benefit of trastuzumabemtansine (TDM1) in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who did not achieve a pathologic complete response, so we have a lot of interesting alternatives of post-neoadjuvant treatments for high-risk patients. The discovery of molecular markers of resistance to endocrinotherapy (cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK 4/6), ER mutation (ESR1), mTOR signaling pathway, co-expression of ER+/HER2+) and inhibitors to them expanded the possibilities of endocrinotherapy not only in advanced and metastatic breast cancer, but also in residual ER+ tumors. The pCR rates in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are around 10%, which is much lower than the values observed in HER2-positive and triple negative subtypes, so new strategies are needed to improve pCR rates in this subgroup, even though the adjuvant endocrine therapy impacts significantly the outcomes of this patients. The cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are serine–threonine kinases that regulate cell cycle progression from the G1 to the S-phase during mitosis. CDKs activity can be abnormally increased or dysregulated in breast cancer, leading to a constant stimulus for cell proliferation and survival, which is a known mechanism of resistance to endocrine treatment. The CDK inhibitors act on CDKs and block their activity, thereby restoring the cell cycle regulation. In studies with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients, the combination of a CDKis with first or second-line endocrine therapy showed significant improvements in progression-free survival and response rates. Evolving techniques such as next-generation sequencing and gene expression profiles have improved our understanding of the biology of residual disease and also the mechanisms involved in treatment resistance.