Abstract

Mobile Mapping Systems (MMS) consist of terrestrial-based moving platforms that integrate a set of imaging sensors (typically digital cameras and laser scanners) and a Position and Orientation System (POS), designed to collect data of the surrounding environment. MMS can be classified as “mapping-grade” or “survey-grade” depending on the system’s attainable accuracy. Mapping-grade MMS produce geospatial data suitable for GIS applications (e.g., asset management) while survey-grade systems should satisfy high-accuracy applications such as engineering/design projects. The delivered accuracy of an MMS is dependent on several factors such as the accuracy of the system measurements and calibration parameters. It is critical, especially for survey-grade systems, to implement a robust Quality Assurance (QA) procedure to ensure the achievement of the expected accuracy. In this paper, a new post-mission QA procedure is presented. The presented method consists of a fully-automated self-calibration process that allows for the estimation of corrections to the system calibration parameters (e.g., boresight angles and lever-arm offsets relating the lidar sensor(s) to the IMU body frame) as well as corrections to the system measurements (e.g., post-processed trajectory position and orientation, scan angles and ranges). As for the system measurements, the major challenge for MMS is related to the trajectory determination in the presence of multipath signals and GNSS outages caused by buildings, underpasses and high vegetation. In the proposed self-calibration method, trajectory position errors are properly modelled while utilizing an efficient/meaningful trajectory segmentation technique. The validity of the proposed method is demonstrated using a dataset collected under unfavorable GNSS conditions.

Highlights

  • Mobile mapping systems (MMS) have emerged as a costeffective method for the rapid collection of geospatial information of the surrounding environment to satisfy the needs of several applications

  • “Mapping-grade” and “survey-grade” are designations commonly used to distinguish between different mobile systems depending on their attainable accuracy/potential applications (Hauser, 2013)

  • This paper has discussed the importance of performing a postmission Quality Assurance (QA) procedure for the achievement of the required data quality, especially for high-accuracy applications

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Mobile mapping systems (MMS) have emerged as a costeffective method for the rapid collection of geospatial information of the surrounding environment to satisfy the needs of several applications. Systematic errors, on the other hand, are mainly caused by biases in the parameters relating the system components (boresight angles and lever-arm offsets relating the lidar sensor(s) to the IMU body frame) as well as biases in the system measurements (e.g., position and orientation information, scan angles and ranges). Initial values for the boresight angles , , and are known from the mechanical alignment while initial values for the lever arm offsets can be obtained from the system engineering drawings and/or through traditional field surveying Such parameters, along with model corrections to the lidar unit. Biases in some of the parameters associated with the lidar unit measurements should be estimated in the calibration process, especially for airborne systems (in-flight calibration), e.g., mirror angle scale, and range offsets (Shenk, 2001; Csanyi, 2008; Kersting, 2011).

LIDAR SYSTEM GEOMETRIC MODEL
POST-MISSION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE – LYNX LMS PRO
Self-Calibration Methodology
Trajectory Corrections Model
RESULTS
FUTURE WORK

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.