Possible role of distinct morphine and enkephalin receptors in mediating actins of benzomorphan drugs (putative kappa and sigma agonists).

Abstract

The binding of many opiates and enkephalins to enkephalin (delta) and morphine (mu) receptors was compared by using three different binding assays: (i) 125I-labeled[D-Ala2, D-Leu5]enkephalin or 125I-labeled[D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Met(O)5ol]-enkephalin to brain membranes; (ii) [3H]ethylketocyclazocine to brain membranes; and (iii) [3H]diprenorphine and [3H]naloxone to neuroblastoma cell and brain membranes, respectively. According to their relative binding potencies and the effects of Na+ and GTP on the binding to these two receptors, opiates and enkephalins can be classified into seven classes: (i) morphine-type mu agonists; (ii) enkephalin-type delta agonists; (iii) mixed agonists-antagonists; (iv) putative kappa agonists; (v) putative sigma agonists; (vi) nalorphine-type antagonists; and (vii) opiate antagonists. Studies with [3H]ethylketocyclazocine do not reveal specific kappa receptors distinct from those already described that bind morphine and enkephalins. The benzomorphan analogs ketocyclazocine and ethylketocyclazocine (putative kappa agonists) and N-allylnormetazocine (putative sigma agonist) bind to morphine (mu) and enkephalin (delta) receptors with similarly high affinities. The potency of putative kappa agonists, measured by competition with binding of the 3H-labeled antagonist, is greatly reduced by the presence of Na+ and GTP; the "Na+ and GTP ratios" are similar to those of morphine and enkephalins. However, Na+ and GTP greatly decrease the potency of binding of putative sigma agonists to enkephalin receptors but only slightly decrease the binding to morphine receptors. These data suggest that putative kappa agonists have agonistic activity toward both receptors, whereas putative sigma agonists behave as agonists for enkephalin receptors but have antagonist activity for morphine receptors. Mixed agonist-antagonists also show smaller difference in affinity to both receptors. These findings may have important implications for understanding the differences in the pharmacological effects of these drugs.