Abstract

The faulty hormonal imprinting theory (published in 1980) and the DOHaD (Developmental Origin of Health and Disease theory (published in 1986) are twin-concepts: both justify the manifestation after long time (in adults) diseases which had been provoked in differentiating cells (e.g. during gestation). This was demonstrated using animal experiments as well, as comparative statistical methods (in human cases). However, there is no explanation for the tools of memorization (even after decades) of the early adversity and the tools of execution (manifestation) in adult age. It seems likely that immune memory is involved to the memorization of early adversity, up to the manifestation of the result (non-communicable diseases). Nevertheless, the relatively short timespan of adaptive immune memory makes this system insuitable for this function, however the newly recognized trained memory of the innate immune system seems to be theoretically suitable for the storage of the records and handling the sequalae, which is the epigenetic reprogramming in the time of provocation, without changes in base sequences (mutation). The flawed (damaged) program is manifested later, in adult age. Evidences are incomplete, so further animal experiments and human observations are needed for justifying the theory.

Highlights

  • Up to the last decades in vertebrates two types of immunity were accepted: innate and adaptive immunity

  • The faulty hormonal imprinting theory and the developmental origin of health and disease (DOHaD)

  • The relatively short timespan of adaptive immune memory makes this system insuitable for this function, the newly recognized trained memory of the innate immune system seems to be theoretically suitable for the storage of the records and handling the sequalae, which is the epigenetic reprogramming in the time of provocation, without changes in base sequences

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Up to the last decades in vertebrates two types of immunity were accepted: innate and adaptive immunity. In the last time it was cleared that animals without adaptive immunity are defended against secondary attacks (re-infection). This observation leads to the discovery of trained immunity (immune memory of innate immunity) which has many-sided evidences today [6]. This type of immune memory is represented by myeloid elements of the immune system: macrophages and monocytes as well, as natural killer cells (NKly) [7]. In addition to the special properties of trained immunity, it helps the memorizing actions of adaptive immunity, by controlling it [8]

THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND FAULTY HORMONAL
THE DOHAD THEORY
The epigenetic reprogramming
Dangerous trained immunity
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call