Abstract

SINCE the discovery of superconductivity in the layered copper oxide materials1, a number of microscopic models have been proposed. To know which of these should be considered further, it is important to determine empirically the symmetry of the superconducting order parameter (the wavefunction of the superconducting condensate). For some time there has been conflicting experimental evidence as to whether the superconducting condensate has s- or d-wave symmetry2; these terms, strictly correct only in tetragonal symmetry, are commonly used to denote whether the superconducting gap is finite in all directions at zero temperature or contains nodes. Tunnelling data along the c axis of these quasi-tetragonal copper oxides, perpendicular to the CuO2 planes, clearly show an s-wave character3,4. Conversely, tunnelling along the a or b axis of YBa2Cu3O7−δ has indicated a d-wave character of the wavefunction5–7, with one exception8. Here I propose that these and other apparently conflicting results can be explained in a consistent way if there exist in the copper oxide superconductors two condcnsatcs, with different symmetry but the same transition temperature—in other words, if there are two kinds of superconducting gap.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.