Possibilities of fish passage through the block ramp: Model-based estimation of permeability

Abstract

Block ramps offer an opportunity to combine hydrotechnical structures with fish passages. The primary study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a block ramp for upstream fish movement in a mountain stream. Geodetic measurements of the bottom surface and water level were taken for three cross-sections. The description of the geometric and hydrodynamic parameters of the block ramp was supplemented with information on the width and length of crevices between boulders. Measurements of the geometric and hydrodynamic parameters of the block ramp were performed at 76 measurement sites, at three different types of discharge. Ichthyological data were collected in the analyzed stream. Measurements covered among others total length, width, and height of caught fish. Salmonid, cottid, balitorid, and cyprinid fish were studied. The determination of the main effects of the geometric and hydrodynamic parameters of the block ramp on the possibilities of use by target fish species employed generalized linear models (GLMs). The study shows that the block ramp cannot provide longitudinal connectivity and migration of fish occurring in the mountain stream. According to estimates, the block ramp did not meet the permeability expectations. The reason for low usefulness of the ramp for fish is particularly excessively strong water current. The stream concentration constituted an unsurmountable velocity barrier for fish moving upstream for each of the analyzed discharges. The developed model suggests that some crevices in the side zones of the ramp could be parts of the migration corridor, but only for small and medium-sized fish. At medium and high water stages, movement of fish in crevices was difficult due to fast water current, and at low and very low discharges, some crevices lost their permeability, and could become ecological traps for fish. The necessity of estimation of ramp permeability during pre-construction phase was emphasized.