Possibilities and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostics of endocervical adenocarcinomas

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the incidence of cervical adenocarcinomas has increased from 5% to 20%. Endocervical adenocarcinomas are characterized by a more aggressive course and early metastasis. Owing to the difficulties in the cytological diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma, early radiation diagnostics and staging subsequently play a key role. Very few studies have examined the use of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing cervical adenocarcinomas. AIM: To determine the diagnostic informativeness of magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of cervical adenocarcinomas according to the T-criterion and assessing the depth of tumor invasion into the stroma of the cervix and clarify the semiotic signs of adenocarcinoma and features of tumor growth in the uterus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 123 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (C53), who underwent diagnosis and treatment between 2020 and 2023, were examined. The examination results of 22 (18%) patients with cervical adenocarcinoma were analyzed. The average patient age was 56 years. A multiparametric magnetic resonance examination of the pelvic organs was performed on 22 patients using tomographs with a magnetic field strength of 1.5 T. Moreover, 14 (64%) patients underwent surgery including extirpation of the uterus and appendages with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The information value of magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated in 11 patients, whose first stage was surgical treatment. RESULTS: In this study, cervical adenocarcinoma was detected in 18% among all cases of cervical cancer. The information value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the local prevalence of endocervical adenocarcinoma according to the T-criterion was as follows (main value with the corresponding 95% confidence interval): sensitivity, 77.78% (39.99%–97.19%); specificity, 50.00% (1.26%–98.74%); positive predictive value, 87.50% (62.64%–96.69%); negative predictive value, 33.33% (7.30%–76.04%); and accuracy, 72.73% (39.03%–93.98%). The information value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the depth of tumor invasion into the cervical stroma was as follows: odds ratio, 3.500 (0.145%–84.694%); sensitivity, 85.7% (0.757%–0.993%); specificity, 33.3% (0.018%–0.0648%); positive predictive value, 75% (0.673%–0.883%); negative predictive value, 50% (0.027%–0.972%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that magnetic resonance imaging is a good tool with high diagnostic informativeness in detecting endocervical cervical adenocarcinoma. The four macrostructures of tumor growth in endocervical adenocarcinoma identified during magnetic resonance imaging data analysis indicate locally aggressive tumor growth and a high frequency of endometrial dropouts. This finding will allow radiologists to structure a descriptive picture, including the verified cervical adenocarcinoma, to enhance methods of developing a treatment plan for the patient.