Possibilities and limitations of cytochemical methods in diagnosis of acute leukemia

Abstract

Accurate identification and classification of leukemic blast cells is a very important prerequisite of the precise diagnosis of acute leukemia and has a great impact on therapy and prognosis. The purpose of this review is to consider, in the broad sense of the word, the present possibilities and limitations of enzyme cytochemistry and to emphasize how cytochemistry may contribute, on integration with the other methods of study, to the final classification and differential diagnosis of acute leukemia, a highly variable hematological disorder. In this review, the role of conventional enzyme cytochemistry, either dominant or subsidiary, in the discrimination of acute leukemia subtypes is discussed. The survey confirms the absolute necessity of immunologic marker analysis in the accurate diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, undifferentiated or minimally differentiated leukemia and mixed-lineage leukemia because in these cases, the cytochemical evaluation provides insufficiently relevant information regarding blast cell origin, specificity of leukemia subtypes and the discrete stages of leukemic cell maturation. On the other hand, cytochemical investigation is appreciated to be dominant over immunophenotyping in characterizing acute myeloid leukemia, because of the lack of specificity of the majority of immunological markers against myeloid antigens and, because of the availability of standardized and sufficiently specific cytochemical reactions. The cytogenetic, molecular biological and electron microscopic studies mentioned in this review supplement the important information for correct differential diagnosis of acute leukemia. The prognostic impact of enzyme cytochemistry in correlation to other methods is evaluated.