Abstract
Since the seminal work of John Nash, convex combinations of actions are known to guarantee the existence of equilibria in strategic-form games. This paper introduces an alternative notion of randomisation among actions – possibilistic randomisation – and investigates the mathematical consequences of doing so. The framework of possibility theory gives rise to two distinct notions of equilibria both of which are characterised in our main results: a qualitative one based on the Sugeno integral and a quantitative one based on the Choquet integral. Then the two notions of equilibrium are compared against a coordination game with payoff-distinguishable equilibria known as the Weak-link game.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
