Abstract

A metaphor is a figure of speech in which a subject is symbolic of another unrelated object. In the present study, we examined neural patterns associated with both novel unfamiliar and conventional familiar metaphoric processing, and how these patterns are modulated by affective valence. Prior to fMRI scanning, participants received a list of word pairs (novel unfamiliar metaphors as well as conventional familiar metaphors) and were asked to denote the valence (positive, negative, or neutral) of each word pair. During scanning, participants had to decide whether the word pairs formed meaningful or meaningless expressions. Results indicate that participants were faster and more accurate at deciding that positively valenced metaphors were meaningful compared to neutral metaphors. These behavioral findings were accompanied by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and the right inferior parietal lobe (RIPL). Specifically, positively valenced novel unfamiliar metaphors elicited activation in these brain regions in addition to the left superior temporal gyrus when compared to neutral novel metaphors. We also found that the mPFC and PCC mediated the processing of positively valenced metaphors when compared to negatively valenced metaphors. Positively valenced conventional metaphors, however, elicited different neural signatures when contrasted with either neutral or negatively valenced conventional metaphors. Together, our results indicate that positively valenced stimuli facilitate creative metaphoric processes (specifically novel metaphoric processes) by mediating attention and cognitive control processes required for the access, integration, and selection of semantic associations via modulation of the mPFC. The present study is important for the development of neural accounts of emotion-cognition interactions required for creativity, language, and successful social functioning in general.

Highlights

  • A metaphor is a figure of speech that describes a subject by stating that it is comparable to another unrelated object (i.e., Her eyes were glistening jewels)

  • Where and how in the brain does affective valence modulate metaphoric processes in general? When participants viewed positively valenced metaphors in general when compared to neutral metaphors, they showed increased activation in regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and the right inferior parietal lobe (RIPL) (Figure 3A). These results indicate that positively valenced stimuli facilitate metaphoric comprehension in general via modulation of attention and cognitive control processes supported by the mPFC, PCC, and the RIPL

  • How do positively valenced stimuli enhance novel metaphoric comprehension, and conventional metaphoric recall in the brain? When we contrasted positively valenced with neutral novel metaphors, we found that participants activated a network of regions including the mPFC, PCC, RIPL, and left superior temporal gyrus (LSTG)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A metaphor is a figure of speech that describes a subject by stating that it is comparable to another unrelated object (i.e., Her eyes were glistening jewels). Metaphoric comprehension is considered a type of creative cognition which involves at least two processing stages, unlike literal utterances which involve only one stage (Giora, 2007). According to the standard pragmatic model (Grice, 1975), when trying to derive meaning from metaphors, the literal interpretation is first computed and rejected as inappropriate, and is replaced with a non-literal figurative meaning. Metaphoric comprehension involves distinct higher-order processes of understanding and experiencing one thing in terms of another (i.e., in the example above, eyes are experienced as jewels). Gentner’s (1983) structural mapping model assumes that the common properties of the topic and the vehicle terms are identified and extracted and are exhaustively checked against one another so that the properties that “match” can serve as the foundation for the metaphor A different approach highlights the similarity between metaphors and analogies, both of which are based on structural mapping (Gentner, 1983). Gentner’s (1983) structural mapping model assumes that the common properties of the topic and the vehicle terms are identified and extracted and are exhaustively checked against one another so that the properties that “match” can serve as the foundation for the metaphor

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call