Abstract
Downstream indirect reciprocity (DIR) is a behavior taking the form of a reaction to an individual’s kindness or reluctance towards a third party. The literature shows that the concept of DIR may be understood in many different systems of assessing an individual’s social exchange, retributive justice, religious belief systems, rudimentary moral systems, and general philosophical treatment, as well as from a natural selection and evolutionary approach. Given the importance of an empirically based examination of DIR, the aim of the current research carried out through Studies 1–5 was fourfold: (a) develop a reliable and psychometrically sound Downstream Indirect Reciprocity Scale (DIRS); (b) establish and examine the factor structure of the DIRS and its statistical properties, using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (Study 1); (c) assess the relationship between the observed measures and latency factor of DIR through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (Studies 2–5); (d) measure the internal consistency and nomological validity (Studies 2–5). Although the first assumption consisted in constructing a questionnaire that would measure both positive and negative aspects of downstream reciprocity, the outcomes of the EFA and CFA confirmed the final version of the scale that assesses only the positive dimension of DIR (Positive Downstream Indirect Reciprocity Scale; PoDIRS-6). In fact, the EFA showed the one factor structure of the new measure, and the findings of the CFAs indicated that it meets the criteria for good fit. All of the analyses conducted defined a preliminary nomological network of convergent constructs (gratitude, life satisfaction, religiosity, and moral concerns). The PoDIRS-6 is the first scale designed to assess a set of ideas that are expressed in the belief that an individual who has done something good might get help from other people in the future. It is encouraged that a questionnaire be developed which will measure the belief that human actions can be punished or reproved when they are negative and morally bad (Negative Downstream Indirect Reciprocity Scale; NeDIRS).
Highlights
A review of the relevant literature reveals that there is no unanimous way of looking at Downstream indirect reciprocity (DIR)
Due to the lack of Polish adaptations of scales that measure belief in a just world, the concept which conceptually seems to be the closest to DIR, we suggest a preliminary set of nomological variables: gratitude, life satisfaction, religiosity, and moral concerns
The analyses of positive downstream indirect reciprocity within a psychological framework confirm that little is theoretically known about this construct and its mechanisms
Summary
A review of the relevant literature reveals that there is no unanimous way of looking at DIR. One of the most pertinent perspectives implies a social exchange theory that captures reciprocal activity in a broad sense. According to this viewpoint, DIR is a behavior taking the form of a reaction to an individual’s kindness or reluctance towards a third party. Somebody that did harm may meet in the future with a negative action of somebody else This results from the fact that individuals living in a society are subject to a cyclical exchange of good and bad things between both friends and strangers. They receive rewards, take advantages, and are punished— in the circle of their closest friends, and in the wider communities in which they have not helped or hurt anyone
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
